Hispanics For School Choice’s Zeus Rodriguez challenges Matt Damon to come see the success of School Choice in Arizona
Hispanics For School Choice's Zeus Rodriguez challenges Matt Damon to come see the success of School Choice in Arizona after picking the headline 'Matt Damon Promotes Anti-School Choice Documentary in Boston' on the #StoryOfTheDay.
School is back in session in some districts; others will be starting back up soon. And tonight in Scottsdale, a panel will debate the future of education in Arizona. For a preview, I’m joined by Zeus Rodriguez, founder and president of Hispanics for School Choice, and Dawn Penich-Thacker with the group Save our Schools Arizona.
Es tiempo para que los líderes Latinos confíen en sus constituyentes y apoyen sus selecciones educacionales. En su libro del 1968 “Pedagogy of the Oppressed”, el educador Brasileño y filosofo Paulo Freire escribió, “el confiar en la gente es la condición previa para cambio revolucionario. Un humanista puede ser identificado más por su confianza en la gente, que lo envuelve en la lucha, más que mil acciones de su favor sin la confianza”. Pero muchos campeones de la comunidad Latina, en las palabras de Freire, “substituyen monólogos, slogans, y comunicados con el dialogo”; y “atentan liberal al oprimido con los instrumentos de domesticación”. Latinos—como cualquier otro—no necesitan que se les diga que debe de hacer o que debe de creer. Nosotros necesitamos estar equipados con las herramientas necesarias para alcanzar nuestro potencial humano máximo. Pero sobre todo lo demás, nosotros necesitamos que confíen en nosotros mientras navegamos nuestro propio camino hacia la liberación. Si se puede buen un slogan efectivo para César Chávez y el United Farm Workers Union en los 1970’s, perro ahora ha sido mal usado tan comúnmente que ha perdido la mayoría de su significado real. Por ejemplo, cuando coros de “si se puede” se pueden escuchar en asambleas dirigidas por las uniones de maestros—los cuales rechazan el derecho de los padres de escoger lo que ellos creen es la mejor opción educacional para sus hijos—tiene mas que ver con negar posibilidades de los niños que ninguna otra cosa. A pesar de las preocupaciones de Latinos en respecto a la retórica del presidente Donald Trump en relación a la inmigración, muchos Latinos continuar priorizando educación sobre todo lo otro. De acuerdo al Pew Research Center, el mejorar el sistema educativo esta al tope de la lista de prioridades de Latinos en el 2017. esto no es sorpresa para esos de nosotros en [...]
It’s time for Latino leaders to trust their constituents and support their educational choices. In his 1968 book, "Pedagogy of the Oppressed," Brazilian educator and philosopher Paulo Freire wrote, “trusting the people is the indispensable precondition for revolutionary change. A real humanist can be identified more by his trust in the people, which engages him in their struggle, than by a thousand actions in their favor without that trust.” But too many champions of the Latino community, in Freire’s words, “substitute monologue, slogans, and communiqués for dialogue,” and “attempt to liberate the oppressed with the instruments of domestication.” Latinos—like everyone else—don’t need to be told what to do or what to believe. We need to be equipped with the tools necessary to reach our full human potential. But above all else, we need to be trusted to navigate our own path towards liberation. Si se puede was an effective slogan for Cesar Chavez and the United Farm Workers Union in the 1970’s, but it has now become so commonly misused that it has lost most of its real meaning. For example, when chants of “si se puede” can be heard at teacher union led rallies—which reject a parent’s right to choose what they believe is the best educational option for their children—it has more to do with denying possibilities to children than anything else. Despite Latino concerns in respect to President Donald Trump’s rhetoric regarding immigration, many Latinos continue to prioritize education above all else. According to the Pew Research Center, improving the educational system tops the list of Latino priorities for 2017. This is no surprise to those of us on either side of the school choice debate. We all agree that public education is failing too many of our most vulnerable children, and that something must change. What we disagree on is who [...]
When two Republican senators, Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, decided to vote against the confirmation of President Donald Trump’s pick for U.S. Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, it wasn't a surprise. If the last nine years as an education reformer have taught me anything, it’s that—regardless of party affiliation—the status quo will not go down without a bitter fight. Senators Collins or Murkowski do nothing to support my rights as a parent or my children’s educational success. In her statement rejecting DeVos, Collins said she was "troubled and surprised" about DeVos’s "lack of familiarity" with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Murkowski also voiced her concerns about a nominee “who has been so immersed in the discussion of vouchers.” It seems Collins is ignorant of DeVos's record on special needs advocacy. Murkowski's primary concern is DeVos’s history of supporting parental choice, but that's a important plank of her own party's platform. Beginning in 2011, as chairwoman of American Federation for Children (AFC), Betsy DeVos led an aggressive effort to pass Wisconsin legislation that would provide the necessary programatic funding for students with special needs who chose private schools in Milwaukee. That bill finally passed in 2016. When AFC first proposed this special needs bill, Milwaukee already had a thriving school choice program that was serving thousands of children with special needs. However, most of these schools had no way of funding many of the additional and costly services these children required, until DeVos's advocacy helped remedy that. While ultimately successful, AFC and its ally’s efforts to support these children and their schools were aggressively opposed by many in the government-run school systems. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act was established as a critical response to most government-run schools systems' refusal to educate children with disabilities. Now that same opposition is not [...]